Menu

End of the Line for Paresky

Visitor blog owner Bob Probasco returns today with possibly his last upgrade on the Paresky situation., 918 F. 2d 15, 18 (2d Cir. That might have shown a reasoning that: (a) the family member know-how of the CFC is much less of a concern; and also (b) there might be a great deal even more tax obligation reimbursement fits than Tucker Act asserts, so it’s much better to spread out those out.

Visitor blog owner Bob Probasco returns today with possibly his last upgrade on the Paresky instance., 420 F. 3d 589 (6th Cir., 918 F. 2d 15, 18 (2d Cir., 827 F. 3d 1026 (Fed. That might have mirrored a reasoning that: (a) the family member experience of the CFC is much less of a problem; and also (b) there might be a whole lot even more tax obligation reimbursement matches than Tucker Act declares, so it’s much better to spread out those out.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *